Methodology
Methodology
The Sciences methodology converts scientific claims into reviewable evidence files, standards checks, public scope statements and renewal cycles.
Step 1
Claim mapping
Identify the exact public claim: product benefit, institutional capability, STEM education quality, AI ethics practice or evidence-backed statement.
Step 2
Evidence file
Collect studies, test reports, protocols, expert statements, data sources, limitations, adverse findings and disclosure documents.
Step 3
Standard alignment
Map each claim against relevant The Sciences standards, including evidence strength, transparency, communication accuracy and renewal requirements.
Review judgment
Assess whether the evidence supports the claim as written, whether language must be narrowed, and whether additional disclosure is required.
Public record
If approved, publish a directory record with credential ID, scope, status, expiry and links. If not approved, provide revision or rejection notes.
Renewal
Reviews are time-bound. Records should be renewed when evidence changes, claims change, ownership changes or the validity period expires.
Operational note
This page is part of The Sciences trust architecture. It is intentionally editable in the WordPress page editor so operators can update language, forms, links and policies without editing PHP theme files.